EVALUATION OF ACCESS TO JUSTICE FOR RURAL WOMEN IN TEXCOCO, FROM A FEMINIST PERSPECTIVE

Authors

  • Claudia Lizbeth Juarez Reyes Estudiante de Doctorado del Colegio de Postgraduados-Campus Montecillo Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63121/t09hev53

Keywords:

Gender, Institutional Violence, Participatory Evaluation, Intersectionality, Revictimization.

Abstract

This article presents a qualitative evaluation of the institutional performance of the Regional Prosecutor’s Office of Texcoco, State of Mexico, in relation to access to justice for rural women who are victims of violence. The research began with the recognition that, despite legal advances in human rights and gender in Mexico, a significant gap persists between the normative framework and its implementation, thus limiting the exercise of rights for rural women who are victims of violence. The study seeks to make visible how structural inequalities related to gender, territory, and class translate into discriminatory, ineffective, or exclusionary institutional practices. From a feminist and intersectional approach, semi-structured and in-depth interviews were conducted with 17 key informants (forensic specialists of the judicial branch, public defenders, lawyers, legal advisors, police officers, members of feminist collectives, and women who are victims of violence). The evaluative criteria used include accessibility, effectiveness, equity, relevance, and the application of a gender perspective. The results show low levels of effectiveness, practices of revictimization, systematic impunity, and a lack of culturally relevant protocols, preventing the existence of an effective or equitable justice system. Despite certain achievements, such as the presence of public defenders and the partial application of protocols, access to justice remains limited for rural women who are victims of violence. The evaluation made it possible to identify critical areas for institutional improvement, including the creation of monitoring systems, the development of differentiated indicators, and the incorporation of participatory evaluations.

References

Álvarez-Gayou, J. (2003). Cómo hacer investigación cualitativa. Paidós Educador.

Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos (CIDH). (2007). Acceso a la justicia para mujeres víctimas de violencia en las Américas. OEA. https://www.oas.org/es/cidh

Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039

Farmer, P. (2004). Pathologies of power: Health, human rights, and the new war on the poor. University of California Press.

Ferrer, V., & Bosch, E. (2019). La investigación y la intervención social desde una perspectiva de género. Tirant lo Blanch.

Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press.

Galtung, J. (1990). Cultural violence. Journal of Peace Research, 27(3), 291–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343390027003005

House, E. R., & Howe, K. R. (1999). Values in evaluation and social research. Sage.

Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI). (2021). Encuesta Nacional sobre la Dinámica de las Relaciones en los Hogares (ENDIREH) 2021. https://www.inegi.org.mx

Juarez Reyes, C. L. (2023). El derecho de las mujeres rurales al acceso a la justicia: logros y retos en la Fiscalía Regional de Texcoco, Estado de México [Tesis de maestría, Colegio de Postgraduados, Campus Montecillo].

Lagarde, M. (1998). Los cautiverios de las mujeres: madresposas, monjas, putas, presas y locas. UNAM.

Observatorio Ciudadano Nacional del Feminicidio (OCNF). (2023). Caso Mariana Lima Buendía: justicia con perspectiva de género después de 13 años. http://ocnf.org.mx

ONU Mujeres. (2019). Marco normativo sobre acceso a la justicia para mujeres víctimas de violencia. https://www.unwomen.org

Publimetro. (2023, enero 6). Edomex cerró 2022 con más de 100 feminicidios. https://www.publimetro.com.mx

Ruido en la Red. (2022, noviembre 9). Edomex encabeza cifras de desapariciones de mujeres en 2022. https://ruidoenlared.com

Schwartz, H., & Jacobs, J. (2006). Sociología cualitativa: Métodos y perspectivas. UAM.

Scriven, M. (2007). Key evaluation checklist. Western Michigan University.

Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación (SCJN). (2013). Protocolo para juzgar con perspectiva de género. https://www.scjn.gob.mx

Vázquez, M. (2014). Violencia institucional hacia las mujeres: el papel de las agencias del Estado. Revista de Estudios de Género La Ventana, 4(39), 190–212.

Published

30-12-2025